“I went to a bookstore and asked the saleswoman, “Where’s the self-help section?” She said if she told me, it would defeat the purpose.”
– next time seek help from a salesman

“If a man is standing in the middle of the forest speaking and there is no woman around to hear him…is he still wrong?”
– No, he’s insane!!

Isn’t it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do “practice?”
– At least they are honest, unlike software engineers

What do you do when you see an endangered animal eating an endangered plant?
– Depends on which one is more tasty

If the police arrest a mute, do they tell him he has the right to remain silent?
– I don’t think Indian cops are aware of such a right in the first place

Women like silent men, they think they’re listening.
– Women think?

Men are from Earth, women are from Earth. Deal with it.
– Why do you think NASA is so desperate to find another inhabitable planet?

If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest have to drown too?
– If the swimmers are women, then yes. If they are men, then it depends on their marital status.

If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?
– Failed at failing

You can also create hierarchy with references. Here is psuedo code.
class TreeBranch {
List<TreeBranch> TreeBranches;
AddChild(TreeBranch tb) { TreeBranches.Add(tb);}
}

Product may have more than what you need i.e. functionality of product is superset of functionality needed. This information may play vital role as you are going to have more than what you need. For example, it is desirable that extra functionality is something which adds value to business. If not, then you are going to have more complex product than you need and you may also end up paying more.

This template is not ‘sourced’ from anywhere. I actually searched for it, but did not find anything. So, I created it.

Regards,
Chetan

Also – can you provide and reference to other sources you used to generate your template?

Thanks
O67

It is purely up to context and viewer’s understanding of same that decides which details of which view (either IVP/OVP) or some combination are focused on. Viewer always has limited resources to do so and may fail to recognize ‘proper’ view. This is how one viewer gets more ‘proper’ knowledge than other viewer.

If a poet tries to look at OVP of a chip, then his OVP will be very different from OVP of systems engineer. None of the OVP is right or wrong until context is agreed upon by both viewers.

Viewer needs to understand both IVP and OVP for gaining knowledge about entity in question. As I have stated ‘In nutshell, you need to know enough of IVP and OVP of a thing to ‘know’ it. That will be more complete knowledge!’.

Also as stated ‘How much details are enough for IVP or OVP is usually context sensitive.’ You can find a context where OVP is very much detailed. I would further say that ‘how much details are necessary’ is decided by viewer. Good viewer will focus on relevant details from infinite details available for both IVP and OVP.

Context in which viewer tries to gain knowledge is very important. If a piece of metal is taken as ‘piece of metal’ then it creates a context and viewer can gather IVP/OVP for this context. But if viewer takes same piece of metal as ‘part of space shuttle’ then it is different context and that will make viewer to have different IVP/OVP for same piece of metal.